1 - 2024 (21)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37129/2313-7509.2024.21.196-208
INTEGRAL-ERGATIC ASPECT OF EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A GROUND ROBOTIC COMPLEX IN LOGISTICS OPERATIONS
|
V. Chepkii |
|
|
V. Skachkov |
|
|
O. Yefymchykov |
|
|
V. Nabok |
|
|
V. Tsukanov |
|
|
Odesa Military Academy |
|
Abstract
The potential efficiency of a ground robotic complex (GRC) to functionally perform tasks in military logistics transportation operations is investigated in terms of a purposeful hierarchical-complex ergatic system (ergasystem) with an emergence feature. The ergosystem is described by the reference model of interaction of the basic components: "mobile GRC - operating environment - anthropogenic association of logistics operations". The methodological basis of the research was chosen to be the integral ergatic aspect arising from the theoretical-experimental method with the quintessence of construction and the simultaneous existence of a set of theoretical models of the transportation operation. The effectiveness of the operation is determined in relation to the resource flows of the logistics process: the result of the task, the mode of operation of the mobile multifunctional robotic platforms, and the way of managing the structures of the GRC. In the context of the integral ergatic approach, the article analyzes the factors that determine the potential efficiency of a transportation operation, empirically establishes hierarchical levels of quality of a logistics operation, introduces a vector indicator of potential efficiency, and states local indicators of operational, technical, operational, economic and resource efficiency that cannot be summarized into a generalized indicator. It is proposed to evaluate the effectiveness of the operation in an integrated manner, based on the technical indicators of the structures of the GRC, on the operational and intellectual capabilities of the active components of the ergosystem. It was decided to evaluate the efficiency of mobile structures of the GRC in logistics operations according to the concept of "ideal" and "real" operators, taking into account the level of human influence on the targeted support of the operation. Variants of formalization of the integration process are presented. It is shown that the objectification of the procedure for qualimetry of the GRC operator’s training creates conditions for improving the means and methods of the user interface, as well as for modernizing the strategy of military professional training of a specialist in the field of military robotics.
Keywords: ground robotic complex, operator, multipurpose robotic platform, remote control system, integrated approach, performance indicators, evaluation model.
References
1. Doctrine "Use of Unmanned Systems in the Defense Forces of Ukraine". (OP 3-0(46)). (2023). [in Ukrainian].
2. Concept of development and application of ground robotic systems (platforms) in the units of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. (VKP 3-00(11).01.). (2021). [in Ukrainian].
3. Voronin, A. N., Ziatdinov, Y. K., Kharchenko, A. V., Ostashevsky, V. V. & Ostashevsky, V. В. (1997). Complex technical and ergatic systems: research methods: monograph. Kharkov: Fakti Publ. [in Ukrainian].
4. Chepkii, V. V., Skachkov, V. V., Yefymchykov, O. M. & Yelchaninov, O. D. (2018). Strategy of technological integration of ground robotic complex into special-purpose supersystems. Collection of scientific works of Odesa Military Academy, 1(19), 110–121. [in Ukrainian].
5. Alekseev, V. V., Zaitsev, A. V. & Lisunkin, P. S. (2018). Methodology for improving the quality of the ergonomic element in ergonomic systems based on artificial intelligence. Reliability and Quality of Complex Systems, 3 (23), 17–22. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.21685/2307-4205-2018-3-3.
6. Petukhov, G. B. & Yakunin, V. I. (2006). Methodological foundations of the external design of goal-directed processes and goal-directed systems. ACT Publ. [in Russian].
7. Khripunov, S. P., Chirov, D. S. & Blagodaryashchev, I. V. (2015). Military robotics: current trends and development vectors. Trends and Management, 4, 41–422. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17117.
8. Quality management systems. Basic provisions and glossary of terms (DSTU ISO 9000:2015 (ISO 9000:2015, IDT)). (2016). DP «UkrNDNTs» Publ. [in Ukrainian].
9. Chepkii, V. V., Skachkov, V. V., Yefymchykov, O. M., Yelchaninov, O. D. & Dudush, A. S. (2018). Conceptualization of the subject area of the model of integrated configuration "Ground robotic complex - supersystem - problematic operating environment". Collection of scientific works of Odesa Military Academy, 2(10), 5–17. [in Ukrainian].
10. Dedkov, V. K. (2013). Principles of formation of criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of the functioning of complex technical systems. Reliability and Quality of Complex Systems, 4, 3-8. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsipy-formirovaniya-kriteriev-i-pokazateley-effektivnosti-funktsionirovaniya-slozhnyh-tehnicheskih-sistem. [in Russian].
11. Zhuk, S. N. (2013). Assessing the performance of complex systems by a hierarchical system of indicators. SPIIRAS Proceedings, 3(26), 194–203. [in Russian].
12. Chepkii, V. V., Yefymchykov, O. M., Tsukanov, V. N. & Osypenko, S. M. (2024). Alternative solutions to the problem of restoring items of a heterogeneous fleet of weapons and military equipment. In Logistics systems of the security and defense sector of Ukraine: problems and development trends (pp. 123–125). Retrieved from https://nangu.edu.ua/uploads/files/
documenty/2024/naukova%20diyalnist/forumy/2024/ЗБІРНИК%20ТЕЗ%20ДОПОВІДЕЙ%202024.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
13. Levkin, I. M. (2017). Comprehensive performance evaluation of robotic information extraction and processing systems. Izv. vuzov. Priborostroenie, Vol. 8, no. 6, 110-116. Retrieved from https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompleksnaya-otsenka-effektivnosti-robototehnicheskih-sistem-dobyvaniya-i-obrabotki-informatsii. [in Russian].
14. Shcherbatov, I. A. (2013). The concept of system analysis of complex weakly formalizable multicomponent systems under uncertainty. Sovremennie tekhnologii. Sistemnii analiz. Modelirovanie, 2, 28–35. [in Russian].
15. Klimov, R. S. (2016). A method for evaluating the professional preparedness of robotics operators. Trendi i upravlenie, 4, 430-437. [in Russian]. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2016.4.17989.
16. Bochkaryova, T. S. (2015). Effectiveness of vocational training for vehicle operators. Ekonomika obrazovaniya, 2, 46–50. Retrieved from : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ effektivnost-professionalnoy-podgotovki-operatorov-transportnyh-sredstv. [in Russian].
17. Gridin, L. A., Kukushkin, Yu. A., Bogomolov, A. V. (2003). The use of mathematical methods in the assessment of the functional state of the human-machine system operator. Chelovecheskii faktor: problemi psikhologii i ergonomiki, 3, 108–109. [in Russian].
The article was submitted 04.04.2024.
V. Chepkii, V. Skachkov, O. Yefymchykov, V. Nabok, V. Tsukanov ©
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)